Common Ground Alliance Best Practices
In 1999, the Department of Transportation sponsored the Common Ground Study. The purpose of the Common Ground Study was to identify and
validate existing best practices performed in connection with preventing
damage to underground facilities.
The collected best practices are intended to be shared
among stakeholders involved with and dependent upon the safe and
reliable operation, maintenance, construction, and protection of
underground facilities. The best practices
contain validated experiences gained that can be further examined and
evaluated for possible consideration and incorporation into state and
private stakeholder underground facility damage prevention
programs.
The Best Practices are
divided into eight chapters that provide a collection of current damage
prevention best practices. The eight
chapters include:
- Planning & Design Best
Practices
- One Call Center Best
Practices
- Location & Marking Best
Practices
- Excavation Best
Practices
- Mapping Best
Practices
- Compliance Best
Practices
- Public Education Best
Practices
- Reporting & Evaluation
Best Practices
|
Download the latest
version of the Best Practices!
Best Practices Version
5.0 was
published in March 2008.
|
In 2000, the Common
Ground Alliance (CGA) was formed to further the work completed during
the Study. The CGA then developed
the Best Practices Committee; the primary purpose of this
committee is to continue to focus on identifying those Best Practices
that are appropriate for each stakeholder group, gauge current levels of
implementation and use of those Best Practices, and encourage and
promote increased implementation of the Best
Practices.
In March 2007, the CGA published Best Practices Version 5.0. This version of the
practices contains the practices statements and supporting descriptions
contained in the Study as well as any new practices passed by the Best
Practices Committee since the completion of the Study in
1999.
New Practices and Practice Modifications:
Neither the Department of
Transportation (DOT) nor the CGA ever intended that the best practices
described in 1999 would constitute a static model. Rather, both anticipated that the best practices would evolve
over time as more was learned and as technology advanced.
Moreover, the CGA and the DOT expected that there likely
would be additional best practices developed by the interested
participants. To propose a new practice or
modification or to review the committee review process, contact the CGA
office (703-836-1709) to visit the New Practice & Process Review section of the
web site.
|